642 Jacksdaw Dr, Austin, TX, 78737 - MLS# 5612089
Reunion Ranch
MLS® #: 5612089 Time on Realty Austin: 11Last checked: 10 minutes ago
Last updated: 07/10/2026
Viewed 3
Saved 0
Bedrooms
4
Bathrooms
3 full / 1 half
Square Feet
3277
Acres
0.24
Property Type
Single Family Residence
Heating
Central
Parking
7, Garage
Year Built
2016
Stories
2
Cooling
Central Air
Days on Market
11
Garages
4
positioned on an exceptional homesite, this property offers a rare setting with greenbelt views both in front of
and behind the home, creating an incredible sense of privacy and openness. No nearby neighborhood compares ...
Property Details Info
Property History
Property Details
Location
Interior Features
Beds and Baths
Building
Building Information
Financial
Property Taxes
Homeowner Association
Payment Calculator
Use our Cash Bridge program to unlock your home equity so you can make a winning offer.
Learn MoreNeighborhood
Schools
| Sycamore Springs Elementary School Public PK to 5 | NR | 6/10 | Read Reviews |
*School data provided by GreatSchools. This information should only be used as a reference. We recommend contacting the local school district to confirm school assignments for this home.
Nearby Similar Homes for Sale
Nearby Recently Sold Homes
Listing provided by
Walzel Properties - Corporate Office | 512-848-7266
The information being provided is for consumers' personal, non-commercial use and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing. Based on information from the Austin Board of REALTORS® (alternatively, from ACTRIS) from July 13th, 2026 at 8:50am. Neither the Board nor ACTRIS guarantees or is in any way responsible for its accuracy. The Austin Board of REALTORS®, ACTRIS and their affiliates provide the MLS and all content therein "AS IS" and without any warranty, express or implied. Data maintained by the Board or ACTRIS may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. All information provided is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed and should be independently verified.
to Top